Archive for December, 2006

Compete.com releases “real” rankings.

December 29, 2006

Compete.com has a great post comparing Unique Visitors VS  Actual member logins to dating sites and show the top 10 rankings for each.   Clearly ranking by member logins is the most important factor because only members can talk to each other and the more members come back the more relationships are formed.

Of the top 5 dating sites listed in terms of member visits  only Plentyoffish has a market presense in Canada.  Canada is the primary market of Plentyoffish.com with way over 10 million monthly logins here.   This easily makes Plentyoffish.com the Largest dating site in North America.     If we throw in UK and Australia data Plentyoffish is easily the largest dating service in the english speaking world beating Match.com in the 2 most important metrics which are member visits and total relationships formed per year.

This causes me grief,  my entire marketing to date has been about Plentyoffish is the under dog and you should use Plentyoffish because its free!.    But now that plentyoffish is transitioning to market leader in many markets  its about expanding the dating industry and not stealing users from other sites.   This tends to be very expensive both in terms of People needed and $$$

Yahoo to surge in 2007.

December 29, 2006

Seems everyone is talking about the demise of yahoo lately.

Yahoo currently monetizes queries at about half of what Google does.  Yahoo has a lot going for it.

1.  Everyone in the affiliate marketing world knows that yahoo’s traffic converts far better then googles.  It seems that people use google more to research and AOL/Yahoo to shop.

2.  Yahoo currently doesn’t geotarget,  this has deflated prices on many keywords.    I’ve seen keywords that are 50% non usa traffic.

3.  Yahoo’s current system is virtually impossible to use.   Try adding hundreds of keywords and ads and you give up in fustration very quickly.   Google lets ads run instantly,  Yahoo takes 3 days if you are lucky.

If Yahoo gets their act together  their Revenue per query will be significantly higher then Google in the USA.

Paypal Launches Virtual Debt Card.

December 26, 2006

http://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=xpt/cps/account/VDCFrequentlyAskedQuestions-outside

If there is uptake on this it will really change online commerce.     You generate a new CC for each purchase you make.   This means most types of CC fraud found online are now impossible as the credit card is invalidated after every use.

The theory is that more people will feel comfortable buying stuff online because now there is no chance of someone stealing your card.     This should increase conversion rates all over the web and raise PPC prices.   Google will have to do something to respond…

This is unbelievable.

December 24, 2006

Class action lawsuits  against Match.com  And Yahoo Personals..  

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10098349/

Now check out these sites and their Terms of Service.  

******************************

www.amateurmatch.com

  • www.gayamateurmatch.com
  • www.asianamateurmatch.com
  • www.ebonyamateurmatch.com
  • www.lesbianamateurmatch.com
  • www.matureamateurmatch.com
  • www.datematch.com
  • www.beematch.com
  • datinggold.comDirect quote from Terms of Service.  (http://www.amateurmatch.com/pop.php?page=terms)

    “2. Online CupidTM Communications: You understand, acknowledge, and agree that some of the user profiles posted on this site may be fictitious, and are associated with to our “Online CupidsTM”, (”OC”). Our OC’s work for the site in an effort to stimulate conversation with users, in order to encourage further and broader participation in all of our site’s services, including the posting of additional information and/or pictures to the users’ profiles. The OC’s also serve to proactively monitor user activities and communications to ensure compliance with our Terms and Conditions. You understand, acknowledge, and agree that the information, text, and pictures continued in the OC’s profiles do not pertain to any actual person, but are included for entertainment purposes only. Nothing contained in any OC profile is intended to describe or resemble any real person - living or dead. Any similarity between OC user profile descriptions and any person is purely coincidental. Please also note that a single OC may be associated with more than one (1) profile on our site.

    You further understand, acknowledge, and agree that, from time-to-time, OC’s may contact both free users and paid users via computer-generated Instant Messages or emails for purposes of encouraging further or broader participation in our site’s services and/or to monitor user activity. These messages may be transmitted to multiple recipients at the same or similar time(s). Messages from OC’s will contain the uniform designation “OC” to notify the user that a message has been received from an Online Cupid. In the event the user responds to an OC message, either via email or Instant Message, the user may receive one or more additional personal or form responses from the OC. You understand, acknowledge, and agree that no physical meeting will ever take place between you and our OC’s, and that the exchange of messages between you and an OC is for entertainment purposes, as well as to encourage further or broader participation in our site’s services and/or to monitor user activities. Notwithstanding the above, the user is not guaranteed a response to any message sent to an OC (or another user).

    We reserve the right to utilize OC’s in connection with other features of our site, either now existing, or to be developed in the future (E.g.: Hotlists, Friend Invites, etc.). You understand, acknowledge, and agree that any involvement or communication with OC’s shall be subject to the conditions, limitations, and acknowledgements contained in this Section and elsewhere in this Agreement.

    Nothing contained in this Section shall create any right to, or expectation of, interaction between users and OC’s. Any question regarding OC participation on our site should be directed to our Customer Service Department.”

  • Dating sites hate christmas.

    December 23, 2006

    This time of year people go crazy and doing customer service on a site is NOT fun, its a total nightmare.  

    Reporters often ask if i’m surprised about whatever it is they want me to comment on.   I can tell you there is very little that surprises me anymore.

    My favorite user complaint  for today is   “This person is married,her husband chased me with a sword down the street. Her picture is a fake!”

    Only a few more days and users will start returning to normal.

    Favorite Complaint for DEC 23rd…   “Had a date and she told me she stabbed her ex boyfriend. Went to jail for 10 days”

    Whats going on in hawaii?

    December 19, 2006

    Its about 8 at night here in hawaii and the sky is full of helicoptors.   One just flew by with a massive spotlight sweeping back and forth over the shore/ocean hovered 10 meters over a near empty parking lot near a Waikiki  hotel by the shore and checked every car.   The other 6 helicoptors I can see from shore are flying  in a search pattern around the island way out over the ocean.

    Can’t wait to get back to Canada tomorrow :)

    Skills and Knowledge and the fall of USA Web Dominance

    December 18, 2006

    If we look into history we can see many patterns repeated over and over.   One of the most interesting is the birth and fall of great empires.    Though out history empires empires have risen and fallen.    The egyption empire lasted for thousands of years,  Rome lasted for a mere 1500 years and the UK for a few hundred years, the last great empire the USA will be surprised within 100 years by china.   The one thing that these empires seem to have in common is the greater the skill and knowledge of the average person the more powerful the empire became and the shorter the empire lasted.      Even if a empire is destroyed suddenly, if the people still retain their skills and knowledge/technology it will be rebuilt.   Germany and Japan were destroyed after WWII and had to pay huge war reparations, yet they still managed to become the second and third most powerful economies in the world.

    This pattern is repeated with corporations, and markets.   I remember reading that in 1940 the average life span of a corporation on what is todays Fortune 500 was about 40 years.   That has now been shortened to 20 years and is shrinking.

    So what does this mean for us?  Well when it comes to the internet, there were many companies created from 95 to 2000 but only a select few made it because of limited ways of monetizing the internet.  This resulted in  a handful of companies virtually controlling the internet. Now here we are a couple of years later and technology has brought us cheap servers and software enabling a new class of companies that can exist and be profitable in a way that they couldn’t be before mostly by using cheap hardware/software and living off of advertising.      What we will continue to see is a steady stream of companies rising and growing to a monster size in a short period of time.   These companies will dominate the markets they created for a period of time only to see their market fragment into niches that will be dominated by multiple large companies.

    I think what history will remember the most about this period of the internet is this is when the USA stopped being the dominate force on the internet.    The forces (technology) that created companies like yahoo are now no longer restricted to the USA.    Other countries have high internet penetration,  major drop in technology costs, and software to create many sites can practically be bought off a shelf now.  With technology costs start becoming marginal, all that is needed is a source of skills and talents and many countries have plenty of that.   Just look Canada and plentyoffish.com,   I created site from my apartment.  No funding, no employees and now have the second largest site in a billion dollar industry.    I have proven its possible and many others will follow now that they know it can be done.

    If I had to sum it up,  i’d say the internet will see many monster sized markets created out of nowhere, only to see them fragment into niches.   As these niches form, the skills and technology needed to become a market leader will grow exponentially.  This will make it virtually impossible for one company to be dominate in multipul fields.    

    Big Dating Site Rollup begins.

    December 16, 2006

    Looks like the guys behind think partnership have created yet another shell company.     They’ve moved over the dating assests of  (AMEX: THK)  to  a shell and now began an acquisition spree.   They just acquired the largest offline dating service.    These offline dating sites tend to sell memberships at $3,000 a year,  which is far higher then any online dating site gets.

    I had a lot of investment bankers contact me last year and the start of this year.   Many of them wanted to roll up the industry but with so many of the major dating sites losing money no one has dared.    It looks like the new approach is to combine online and offline dating.   The only problem is that this new company doesn’t have a major presence in the online dating market.   They have a big adult dating site, and vintacom which is a application service provider for hundreds of dating sites.   Meetic is shopping for a North American expansion and shell company  “Mountains West” hunting for a large american dating site.    That probably puts date.com, Zencon and Cupid.com in play,  I wonder which gets sold first?    True.com has been trying to sell its self for years,  with no takers.  Match.com might make a defensive aquisition,  Should be an interesting new year as the dating industry once again goes through major upheaval.

    New Facebook Monetization Hype

    December 14, 2006

    Seems this latest release about projected earnings for facebook shows just how out of touch many execs are about how well a social network can be monitized.

    Click thru rates for social networks  are around 0.05% ( half of 1 percent),  this is because they have really high pageviews per user ratio.  If click thru rates were to rise  pageviews per user would decline sharply as the 2 are related.  The monetization of facebooks inventory is currently around 17 cents a CPM and is projected to rise to $3.78 a cpm BY 2015.

    With a click thru ratio of around .05 that means that for every 2 CPM’s you get you get 1 click.    Current monetization on facebook would be34 cents a click according to that yahoo chart.    I think nearly everyone in the affiliate and marketing would laugh at the idea of paying $7.56 a click on facebook in the year 2015.    Most of internet advertising today is based on direct marketing, and there is no one out there that can monetize all of a social neworks inventory at over 60 cents/click.

    People who think that they can monetize social networking widgets at a $10/CPM  or anything above 50 cents/cpm will be in for a shock.   If social networks currently can’t monetize at higher then 17 cents a CPM then what makes them think they can ?

    The only way that facebook could generate that much money is if they got branded ads for the site.  But given that myspace, facebook, bebo, youtube and every other major site under the sun now wants branded advertisers that market is going to collaspe.   The same thing happened to adsense.  Before the social networks started using adsense the CPM’s were really high and since then they have steadily collapsed as they just have to much inventory.

    I just can’t see this fantasy turning into reality,  like many other major site owners if I started getting paid $7.56 a click  my sites valuation would be in the billions. 

    Alexa tries to convince people they are actually useful

    December 13, 2006

    Alexa made a blog post on how good their stats are and compared their charts with that of techcrunch.com.   Techcrunch’s stats are in the public domain and the site recieves around 85,000pageviews a day.

    Plentyoffish gets over 22 million pageviews a day, and i’ve attached a screen shot from google analytics here…

    Stats

    Now plentyoffish has 260 times more pageviews then Techcrunch.com in any given day.    Well according to alexa plentyoffish only has 2 times as many pageviews.       Here alexa is out by a factor  of 130  for 2 sites that are supposidly in the top 600 sites on the net.

    I’m not even going to bother commenting on the visitors per day comparison because they are also out by a similar factor.   Over all rank  for Techcrunch is 340-550,   plentyoffish ranks 641.   If anyone thought alexa had any credability  this should make them think twice.